Purpose, under pressure
Purpose is a hot topic at the moment, if only because the market is cooling under the threat of some kind of recession.
Last Saturday’s Weekend Mumbo took a dive into the icy waters to explore whether some businesses and brands could soon be drowning if they cling to their purpose over profit – for others, purpose could indeed be a life raft if you hold fast long enough.
I made a small contribution including this comment – “Some companies will get found out to have overstated their purpose, under pressure” – although the Weekend Mumbo also happened to omit a small bit of grammar from my original written quote, the comma.
English has never been the most accurate of languages, although I should say that I find its ambiguity intriguing. And this sentence is a case in point: retain the comma and “under pressure” could equally describe one or the other of two scenarios. It could describe the possibility that market economics are putting pressure on purpose, so much so that businesses might prioritise profit regardless of their commitment to purpose and consequently get “found out”.
Or, it could describe the possibility that market expectations created the pressure in the first place that led those businesses and brands to “state” or “overstate” a purpose, regardless of its relevance or value.
It’s all too easy to conflate the two: the symptoms may be similar (and they are indeed linked), but the diagnoses are different. Did your business fail to deliver its purpose under operational pressures, and therefore you need to rethink if and how you might ultimately be able to transpose that purpose into profit? Or, did your business initially create its purpose under pressure, and therefore you need to rethink if your pursuit of profit can ever be purposeful?
Both are powerful questions to ask, and they lead in different directions.
Either way, one thing in this debate is clear and it’s the fact that businesses no longer exist simply to return value to shareholders, they’re here to create value for customers. And that’s the reality that every business needs to explore, with purpose.
Related articles
Why did Google just change its logo?
When Mumbrella discovered that Google had made what seemed to be a small change to its logo this week, we went to Rich Curtis, CEO of FutureBrand Australia, to interpret what that meant in design language. For the record, the change involves the primary colours inside the "G": they used to be separated by hard lines, now they blend into one another with gradients.
Is there a simple answer to the complex questions AI is posing?
Artificial intelligence feels like an experiment where no-one quite knows how the various elements will react.
Who cares about your rebrand?
With many companies rolling out new logos, refreshed names and revamped strategies, FutureBrand's General Manager, Christina Kokkinakis asks the pivotal question.